
Lake Havasu. While I'm not overly fond of the town itself, this place happens to have THE BEST sunsets you could ever possibly imagine. The crystal clear blue skys, the booming thunderstorms over the lake, and the beautiful hues of the setting sun make photography in this town a snap (pun intended). I guess I owe this little pond a debt of thanks because it turned my love of nature into a love of capturing nature...on digital film. I also learned that changing the exposure, contrast, saturation in post can change a good picture into a great picture but finding the balance between editing and the brass tax of the photo is a fine line you have to learn to walk.
The first image is completely unedited. I figured that it would be counterproductive to edit a photo that is so still and complete on its own. I probably could have punched up the color like I did on the following 3 but I think the most stunning photos are also the most real. Now after taking a few stills and editing them I've started realizing how little of what we see in the media is realistic. I've started looking at magazines and images online and can start picking out how the photograph was edited but at the end of the day you still have to have good "bare bones" in a photograph before you start tweaking it.
 |
|
But for sake of argument lets look on the flip side of the coin. I have on occasion found that enhancing the color of the photo actually makes it obviously more visually impressive and to be honest more like what it was like to view it in person. For example this shot of a thunderstorm rolling in over the lake was absolutely stunning in person but I found that when I photographed it, it looked dull. Probably with the low level of light and the fact I'm not using a camera I can truly adjust I had to go back and doctor the photo to make it look more like what I was seeing in person.
I guess what you see isn't always what you get in photography or in life for that matter.
But hey, it always comes down to perspective right?